As Doctoroff prepared for yet another milestone in a year of planning and community engagement, it was almost certain that of the many questions headed his way, digital privacy would be among them. Post-Arizona, should he allow AV firms to double down on experimentation? When it came to testing new technology, how safe was safe enough? This was not to say that it was better than the warfighters or would replace their jobs, but it was evidence that autonomous robots deployed in this fashion could keep up with the pace of operators, serve as a force multiplier, and help protect civilian and service member lives.
Tap here to turn on desktop notifications to get the news sent straight to you. Indeed, privatization -- the decision to contract out government operations to private, profit-making firms -- is the darling of many who have given up on government doing things right or just assume that the private sector can do it faster, better, and cheaper.
With about 54, employees, Google is the size of many federal agencies. Known for its innovation, its rapid growth, and its leadership, Google would seem to be a model for a well-run government agency. Fast on its feet, staffed by eager and smart young people, able to get things done right -- what could be better?
First, it would house three to four government worker teams in a well-furnished and naturally lighted building, in glass-enclosed space so they would have maximum interaction and can get lots of sun.
It would also allow them to bring their dogs to work. How about a free haircut better than wasting time getting it done somewhere else during the day -- or a free massage to relieve stress? Or what about space and equipment to play ping pong, pool, foosball or video games, all provided because breaks and human interaction spark creativity?
And then it would give each government worker the freedom to spend up to 20 percent of her or his time working somewhere else -- their choice -- in the organization on some other project that they think will benefit the agency, thus encouraging both innovation and cross-fertilization of people and ideas.
It would also give them a free ride from home to work and back again because that saves time in commuting and lessens the hassle and loss of energy in their day. It would also provide government workers a concierge team, to help with such tasks as getting the oil changed in their cars, dry cleaning, and DVD rentals.
Of course, we will never know. If any of these things were even contemplated as employee services and perks in government, the public would not stand for it and members of Congress would be lined up to hold hearings demanding why taxpayer dollars were being used to coddle feds.
If we want to treat government workers like Google employees, we would pay them at the top of the pay scale for comparable jobs to keep the best and the brightest at work.
We would give them regular bonuses and stock options perhaps U. Federal worker pay has been frozen for three years, and the Office of Management and Budget has banned most awards and bonuses for government workers due to sequestration.
And the President has decided not to issue any Presidential Rank Awards to top federal executives, the first time that has been done since the awards were created in This is not an argument to create Google-like services for government workers.
It is an argument to reality-check our rhetoric. The truth is, we prefer our government workers to be treated just OK, not like Googlers. Government is the servant of the people, and we would find it unseemly for our public servants to be treated so well.
Google employees are admired, treated with dignity, and are seen as models of twenty-first century workers. Government workers rarely get this level of respect and admiration, nor do they expect it.
The reality is that employees -- not systems, processes, or technology -- are the single most important factor by far in any effort, government or private, to make an organization productive and effective. So how we treat them matters.Working-class Americans are virtually absent from elected office.
Millionaires run our government. Here’s why that matters.
profit-oriented jobs in . The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Amendments Act of was signed into law on September 25, and becomes effective January 1, Rhetoric about the tax bill has gotten disconnected from the way Americans are likely to feel the bill's effects. At first, the tax bill would provide a tax cut to most Americans.
Tax increases. Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (and Stick You with the Bill) [David Cay Johnston] on rutadeltambor.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Free Lunch answers the great mystery of our time: How did our strong . Oct 05, · The idea that government should be run like a business is a popular one with both Republicans and, albeit to a lesser extent, Democrats.
But this betrays a . Oct 05, · The idea that government should be run like a business is a popular one with both Republicans and, albeit to a lesser extent, Democrats. But this betrays a basic misunderstanding of the roles of.