Submit Totally distorted debate Both sides of this debate misleadingly trot out extreme examples to support their case. One side has anecdotes about immigrants who became billionaire business moguls, falsely suggesting that all many? The other side has anecdotes about immigrants who murder and steal, falsely implying that all most? Arguing through anecdote is rubbish.
In any public place nowadays we can see people of different races everywhere mostly begging or asking us to buy things we usually do not want. Should immigration laws be more restrictive? Many people say this phenomenon is irreversible and that our future is that of a multiracial, multiethnic society regardless of whether laws are changed or not.
However, it is clear that we must regulate immigration in some way and try to control it before it controls us.
The first reason why we should restrict immigration is that it is very often a cause of poverty: Many immigrants cant find a regular job or even obtain a residence permit, so they often become poorer than they used to be when they lived in their countries.
The main consequence of poverty is obviously crime, which is another good reason why immigration should be restricted. Poor immigrants must find ways to survive, so they often break the law and become criminals in order to get some money or find something to eat.
However, crime is not just stealing but also working without a regular permission, and that is exactly what most of the immigrants do once they manage to reach Italy.
Moreover, illegal workers are not protected by the law, so the government has no means to protect them from exploitation. The third reason why immigration laws should be more restrictive is the economical damage that an excessive emigration may cause to developing countries.
Emigration, in fact, means a huge loss of workersand it constitutes a considerable obstacle to economical and social development:Comprehensive and meticulously documented facts about immigration. Learn about demographics, economics, laws, crime rates, citizenship requirements, factors that drive immigration, and much more.
After all, I’m arguing that the United States government should change its laws to allow for more legal immigration, not that the U.S. government should cede all of its power to a foreign sovereign.
We don't need more restrictions on immigration. I do not think we should have any restrictions on immigration. The people that are immigrating to America are just trying for a better life and a better life for their family.
As long as the people that are immigrating are getting jobs and not milking the system, we don't need restrictions. Presentation. Today’s migration makes up the vastest movement of people of all times.
In these last decades, the phenomenon, now involving about two hundred million individuals, has turned into a structural reality of contemporary society.
America’s immigration policy seems to be set in some aspirational abstract, focused on the type of country we want to be, but detached from real-world considerations. The Naturalization Act of established the first rules for acquiring citizenship in the United States of America.
The act created a uniform rule of naturalization and a residency requirement for new citizenship applicants.